Open EOI / DOI Content (en )

This page shows the complete content. Each Part will be loaded and completed separately.

Open EOI / DOI Part 1: Organization, Applicant, and Product/Technology Information Open EOI Part 1 1.1 GreenFIT Id GreenFIT Id 1.2 Application date Application date 1.3 Technology Name Please provide the name of your Product / Technology that is proposed for a potential GreenFIT pilot project: 1.4 Technology Description Please provide a high-level description of your Product / Technology(10-15 words): 1.5 Applicant Contact Name Please provide the name of the person to contact regarding this application: 1.6 Applicant Contact Email Please provide the applicant contact email address: 1.7 Applicant Contact Phone Please provide the applicant contact phone number: 1.8 Applicant Title Please provide your title or role in the organization: 1.9 Applicant Company Please provide the legal name of the organization making this application: 1.10 Trade Name Please provide the company trading name of the organization making this application: (enter the same name as the legal name unless it is different): 1.11 Company Street Address Please provide the organization street address: 1.12 City Please provide the town or city: 1.13 Province or State Please provide the province or state: 1.14 Postal Code Please provide the postal code: 1.15 Country Please provide the country: 1.16 Company Phone Number Please provide the phone number for the organization: 1.17 Organization Size For each of the categories below, please select the range that describes the size of your organization: Revenues Less than $100K $100K-$1M $1M-$10M $10M-$100M $100M-$1B More than $1B Number of local employees in Ontario Less than 50 50-100 100-500 500-1000 1000-10000 More than 10000 Number of global employees Less than 50 50-100 100-500 500-1000 1000-10000 More than 10000 1.18 Solution Classification Please select the Solution classification from the following list: Solar Wind Biomass / biofuel Geothermal Co-generation Energy monitoring Energy management / control Water treatment, recycling or conservation Solid waste treatment, recycling or conservation Liquid / gaseous emission treatment, recycling or conservation Other 1.19 Functional Classification Please select the functional classification from the following list: Electricity generation Energy conservation Heating / cooling Alternative fuels Fuel conservation Resource conservation Waste reduction Emission reduction Other 1.20 Potential Pilot Project Product / Technology Focus Please select the potential Pilot Project Product / Technology from the following list: Carbon/GHG/Toxic Emission reductions Waste Diversion Resource Conservation (e.g. water) Energy Conservation Renewable Energy Generation: Wind Electric Power Renewable Energy Generation: Solar Electric Power Renewable Energy Generation: Solar Thermal Power Renewable Energy Generation: Geothermal Power Renewable Energy Generation: Biofuel 1.21 Potential Pilot Project Focus Please select one OPS/MASH application sector from the following list which would likely be the focus for a potential pilot project of your Product/Technology : Health/Long Term Care Education Colleges and Universities Public housing Justice / Corrections Justice / Corrections Municipal infrastructure (specify below) Provincial infrastructure (specify below) Specific OPS Ministry (specify below) Specific OPS Operations (specify below) 1.22 Potential Pilot Project Focus: Specify Specify additional details if appropriate relating to above question, or enter "N/A" if not applicable:

Open EOI / DOI Part 2: Additional Organization and Product / Technology Information Open EOI Part 2 2.1 Solution(s) Overview: Summary Please describe in a maximum of 300 words your Solution(s), and its applicability to reducing the OPS/MASH Ontario environmental footprint Selection Criteria Links Part 4: Environmental Benefits Part 4: Product/Technology Readiness Part 4: Product/Technology Competitive Differentiation Part 4: Rollout potential 2.2 Solution(s) Overview: Market status Please indicate below the current status of the introduction and/or take up of your Solution(s) in commercial markets: Has not yet been introduced to the market In early market trials Completed market trials and is in limited initial distribution Has achieved success in local markets Has achieved success in local markets and is being introduced to national markets Has achieved success in national markets Has achieved success in national markets and is being introduced to international markets Has achieved success in international markets Selection Criteria Links Part 4: Product/Technology Readiness 2.3 Solution(s) Overview: Intellectual Property (Patent) Status and Ownership Please specify below the nature and ownership status of patents relating to the Solution(s) proposed for the proposed project, as well as other IP protection that applies Please click all that apply Patent Status in Canada None filed Filed pending approval 1-3 granted More than 3 granted Patent Status International None filed Filed pending approval 1-3 granted More than 3 granted Patent ownership No patents Owned by company In-licensed from Cdn 3rd party In-icensed from global 3rd party Other IP Protection Trade secrets Trademarks Copyright Other Selection Criteria Links Part 4: Product/Technology Competitive Differentiation 2.4 Solution(s) Overview: Impact validation Please select which of the following best represents the degree of performance validation has been conducted on your Product / Technology to verify the environmental and operating impacts referenced above. Select only one item from the following list: No substantive validation Internal validation through bench type testing Performance model projections Prototype / pilot beta testing Validation through data gathering in initial installations Third party certification from a recognized source Selection Criteria Links Part 4: Product/Technology Readiness 2.5 Solution(s) Overview: Typical Installation Please describe below a typical installation (Maximum 250 words). An installation is defined as including all of the products / services (including multiple product units if applicable) to generate the environmental impacts for an end-user in a single facility. Selection Criteria Links Part 4: Environmental Benefits Part 4: Rollout potential 2.6 Solution(s) Overview: Supply Chain Please describe below the supply chain for the Solution, including R&D, design, sourcing, manufacturing, distribution and service (maximum 250 words) Selection Criteria Links 2.7 Project Overview: Potential Pilot Project Summary Please describe below the proposed objectives that would be targeted in a proposed pilot project. (Maximum 100 words): Selection Criteria Links Part 4: Need for a demonstration project 2.8 Project Overview: Summary Budget Provide the anticipated breakdown of Project Costs in the spaces below. Enter amounts in Canadian dollars. Do not add any non-numerical characters, $ signs, commas, periods or spaces. Do not enter totals in the blue fields as these are calculated automatically when you click in another field or elsewhere on the page. Solution(s) acquisition Year1: Year2: Installation Year1: Year2: Operating Costs Year1: Year2: Performance tracking and validation Year1: Year2: Decommissioning at project conclusion Year1: Year2: Other Year1: Year2: Selection Criteria Links 2.9 Project Overview: Potential Pilot Project Risk Please provide an overview of the levels of risk which must be taken into account during a potential pilot project. For each category, please select one: Please click all that apply Technology Risk Low Moderate/manageable Significant challenge Major challenge Market Risk Low Moderate/manageable Significant challenge Major challenge Implementation Risk Low Moderate/manageable Significant challenge Major challenge Selection Criteria Links Part 4: Need for a demonstration project 2.10 Company Overview: Highlights Please provide a brief description of your company, its history, and its operations (200 words or less): Selection Criteria Links 2.11 Company Overview: Years in Business Please indicate below how many years your company has been in business (select one): Less than 2 2 to 5 5 to 10 More than 10 Selection Criteria Links 2.12 Company Overview: Profitability Hisotry Please indicate below the profitability history of your company (select one only): Financial statements have not shown a profit since the company was founded Financial statements show one or more recent years with losses Financial statements show initial losses but consistent profitability in recent years Financial statements show consistent profitability since the company was founded Selection Criteria Links 2.13 Commercialization Overview: Product Positioning of Market Rollout If a potential pilot project were successful, how would you foresee the positioning of the Product/Technology in a commercial market roll-out: A useful addition to existing product offerings A major addition to existing product offerings A major new product line The cornerstone of the future offerings of the company Selection Criteria Links Part 4: Market Opportunity 2.14 Commercialization Overview: Resource Requirements for Market Roll-out If a potential pilot project were successful, how would you characterize the resources required over the next five years to support a market roll-out: Would likely require significant new resources to support roll-out Would likely require significant additions to existing resources to support roll-out Would likely require some additions to existing resources to support roll-out Would likely be able to support roll-out from existing resources Selection Criteria Links Part 4: Market Opportunity 2.15 Commercialization Overview: Market Roll-out Risk Please provide an overview of the levels of risk which must be taken into account during a potential rollout subsequent to a successful pilot project. For each category, please select one: Please click all that apply Technology Risk Low Moderate/manageable Significant challenge Major challenge Market Risk Low Moderate/manageable Significant challenge Major challenge Implementation Risk Low Moderate/manageable Significant challenge Major challenge Selection Criteria Links Part 4: Market Opportunity

Open EOI / DOI Part 3: Analysis of Environment, Operating and Market Information Open EOI Part 3 Page 1 3.1 Potential Applications of Solution(s) From the following list, select the application(s) in which your Solution(s) could have a significant environmental impact and/or could significantly reduce operating costs. Click "applicable" for as many as are relevant. In the subsequent screens in this Part, you will be asked to provide range estimates of impacts only for items specified as applicable Residential Buildings Applicable Not applicable Office / Commercial Buildings Applicable Not applicable Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facilities Applicable Not applicable Health / Long-term Care Facilities Applicable Not applicable School Facilities Applicable Not applicable Universities and Colleges Facilities Applicable Not applicable Public Housing Facilities Applicable Not applicable Correctional Facilities Applicable Not applicable Vehicle Fleets Applicable Not applicable Electricity System Infrastructure Applicable Not applicable Municipal Infrastructure Applicable Not applicable Provincial Infrastructure Applicable Not applicable Selection Criteria Links 3.2 Solution(s) Primary Application From the following list, select the primary application(s) in which your Solution(s) could have the most significant environmental impact and/or could significantly reduce operating costs. Residential Buildings Office / Commercial Buildings Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facilities Health / Long-term Care Facilities School Facilities Universities and Colleges Facilities Public Housing Facilities Correctional Facilities Vehicle Fleets Electricity System Infrastructure Municipal Infrastructure Provincial Infrastructure Selection Criteria Links 3.3 Solution(s) Secondary Application From the following list, select the secondary application(s) in which your Solution(s) could have the second most significant environmental impact and/or could significantly reduce operating costs. Residential Buildings Office / Commercial Buildings Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facilities Health / Long-term Care Facilities School Facilities Universities and Colleges Facilities Public Housing Facilities Correctional Facilities Vehicle Fleets Electricity System Infrastructure Municipal Infrastructure Provincial Infrastructure Selection Criteria Links Page 2 3.4 Residential Buildings Lifecycle Indicate the expected lifecycle, in years, of the Solution(s) in use in Health / Long-term Care facilities [Select] Less than 2 years 2 - 4 years 4 - 8 years 8 - 12 years 12 - 20 years More than 20 years Selection Criteria Links 3.5 Capital Cost for Residential Buildings Select the approximate one-time capital cost that would be invested by a typical Health / Long-term Care Facility to acquire the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.6 Recurring cost for Residential Buildings Select the approximate recurring annual costs that would be paid by a typical Health / Long-term Care Facility to operate the Solution(s) [Select] less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.7 Recurring savings for Residential Buildings Select the approximate recurring annual cost savings that would be experienced by a typical Health / Long-term Care Facility that has acquired the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.8 Residential Buildings Most Significant Environmental Impact Using the pull-down menu below, specify the single area in which adoption of your Solution would have the largest incremental environmental impact [Select] Net electrical energy savings in buildings Net thermal energy savings in buildings Fuel consumption in vehicles Net energy use in manufacturing, agricultural, resource or other production Net energy use in infrastructure Water conservation Waste reduction or diversion Other (specify below) Selection Criteria Links 3.9 Residential Buildings Other Environmental Impact If you selected "Other" immediately above, provide a name or label for the impact measure (specify N/A if not applicablel). Selection Criteria Links 3.10 Residential Buildings Environmental Impact Unit of Measure Please specify, as relevant, the unit of measure that is relevant for the measuring the most significant environmental impact [Select] kwh cubic meters of natural gas equivalent litres tonnes Selection Criteria Links 3.11 Residential Buildings Environmental Impact Baseline In order to quantify a baseline for purposes of estimating the incremental environmental impact of your Solution(s) in a typical facility, by reference to the environmental impact and unit of measure selected above, provide an estimate of the average annual quantity of the units of measure specified above that would be consumed, generated, or otherwise occur in the absence of your Solution(s) Selection Criteria Links 3.12 Residential Buildings Environmental Impact Estimate How would the baseline quantity specified above be expected to change on an annual basis as a result of adopting the Solution(s) Not applicable / cannot estimate More than 50% annual net increase 30%-50% annual net increase 15%-30% annual net increase 10%-15% annual net increase 6%-10% annual net increase 3%-6% annual net increase Up to 3% annual net increase No change anticipated Up to 3% annual net reduction 3%-6% annual net reduction 6%-10% annual net reduction 10%-15% annual net reduction 15%-30% annual net reduction 30%-50% annual net reduction More than 50% annual net reduction Selection Criteria Links 3.13 Potential candidates for adoption among Residential Buildings within 5 years State the approximate number of Residential Buildings that could reasonably be expected to adopt the Solution(s) in Ontario within 5 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links 3.14 Long-term potential candidates for adoption among Residential Buildings State the approximate number of Residential Buildings that are potential Ontario candidates for adopting the Solution(s) within 10 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links Page 3 3.15 Office / Commercial Buildings Lifecycle Indicate the expected lifecycle, in years, of the Solution(s) in use in Office / Commercial Buildings [Select] Less than 2 years 2 - 4 years 4 - 8 years 8 - 12 years 12 - 20 years More than 20 years Selection Criteria Links 3.16 Capital Cost for Office / Commercial Buildings Select the approximate one-time capital cost that would be invested by a typical Office / Commercial Building to acquire the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.17 Recurring cost for Office / Commercial Buildings Select the approximate recurring annual costs that would be paid by a typical Office / Commercial Building to operate the Solution(s) [Select] less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.18 Recurring savings for Office / Commercial Buildings Select the approximate recurring annual cost savings that would be experienced by a typical Office / Commercial Building that has acquired the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.19 Office / Commercial Buildings Most Significant Environmental Impact Using the pull-down menu below, specify the single area in which adoption of your Solution would have the largest incremental environmental impact [Select] Net electrical energy savings in buildings Net thermal energy savings in buildings Fuel consumption in vehicles Net energy use in manufacturing, agricultural, resource or other production Net energy use in infrastructure Water conservation Waste reduction or diversion Other (specify below) Selection Criteria Links 3.20 Office / Commercial Buildings Other Environmental Impact If you selected "Other" immediately above, provide a name or label for the impact measure (specify N/A if not applicablel). Selection Criteria Links 3.21 Office / Commercial Buildings Environmental Impact Unit of Measure Please specify, as relevant, the unit of measure that is relevant for the measuring the most significant environmental impact [Select] kwh cubic meters of natural gas equivalent litres tonnes Selection Criteria Links 3.22 Office / Commercial Buildings Environmental Impact Baseline In order to quantify a baseline for purposes of estimating the incremental environmental impact of your Solution(s) in a typical facility, by reference to the environmental impact and unit of measure selected above, provide an estimate of the average annual quantity of the units of measure specified above that would be consumed, generated, or otherwise occur in the absence of your Solution(s) Selection Criteria Links 3.23 Office / Commercial Buildings Environmental Impact Estimate How would the baseline quantity specified above be expected to change on an annual basis as a result of adopting the Solution(s) Not applicable / cannot estimate More than 50% annual net increase 30%-50% annual net increase 15%-30% annual net increase 10%-15% annual net increase 6%-10% annual net increase 3%-6% annual net increase Up to 3% annual net increase No change anticipated Up to 3% annual net reduction 3%-6% annual net reduction 6%-10% annual net reduction 10%-15% annual net reduction 15%-30% annual net reduction 30%-50% annual net reduction More than 50% annual net reduction Selection Criteria Links 3.24 Potential candidates for adoption among Office / Commercial Buildings within 5 years State the approximate number of Office / Commercial Buildings that could reasonably be expected to adopt the Solution(s) in Ontario within 5 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links 3.25 Long-term potential candidates for adoption among Office / Commercial Buildings State the approximate number of Office / Commercial Buildings that are potential Ontario candidates for adopting the Solution(s) within 10 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links Page 4 3.26 Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Lifecycle Indicate the expected lifecycle, in years, of the Solution(s) in use in Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facilities [Select] Less than 2 years 2 - 4 years 4 - 8 years 8 - 12 years 12 - 20 years More than 20 years Selection Criteria Links 3.27 Capital Cost for Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facilities Select the approximate one-time capital cost that would be invested by a typical Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facility to acquire the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.28 Recurring cost for Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facilities Select the approximate recurring annual costs that would be paid by a typical Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facility to operate the Solution(s) [Select] less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.29 Recurring savings for Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facilities Select the approximate recurring annual cost savings that would be experienced by a typical Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facility that has acquired the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.30 Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facilities Most Significant Environmental Impact Using the pull-down menu below, specify the single area in which adoption of your Solution would have the largest incremental environmental impact [Select] Net electrical energy savings in buildings Net thermal energy savings in buildings Fuel consumption in vehicles Net energy use in manufacturing, agricultural, resource or other production Net energy use in infrastructure Water conservation Waste reduction or diversion Other (specify below) Selection Criteria Links 3.31 Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Other Environmental Impact If you selected "Other" immediately above, provide a name or label for the impact measure (specify N/A if not applicablel). Selection Criteria Links 3.32 Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Environmental Impact Unit of Measure Please specify, as relevant, the unit of measure that is relevant for the measuring the most significant environmental impact [Select] kwh cubic meters of natural gas equivalent litres tonnes Selection Criteria Links 3.33 Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Environmental Impact Baseline In order to quantify a baseline for purposes of estimating the incremental environmental impact of your Solution(s) in a typical facility, by reference to the environmental impact and unit of measure selected above, provide an estimate of the average annual quantity of the units of measure specified above that would be consumed, generated, or otherwise occur in the absence of your Solution(s) Selection Criteria Links 3.34 Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Environmental Impact Estimate How would the baseline quantity specified above be expected to change on an annual basis as a result of adopting the Solution(s) Not applicable / cannot estimate More than 50% annual net increase 30%-50% annual net increase 15%-30% annual net increase 10%-15% annual net increase 6%-10% annual net increase 3%-6% annual net increase Up to 3% annual net increase No change anticipated Up to 3% annual net reduction 3%-6% annual net reduction 6%-10% annual net reduction 10%-15% annual net reduction 15%-30% annual net reduction 30%-50% annual net reduction More than 50% annual net reduction Selection Criteria Links 3.35 Potential candidates for adoption among Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facilities within 5 years State the approximate number of Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facilities that could reasonably be expected to adopt the Solution(s) in Ontario within 5 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links 3.36 Long-term potential candidates for adoption among Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facilities State the approximate number of Industrial, Resource or Agriculture Production Facilities that are potential Ontario candidates for adopting the Solution(s) within 10 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links Page 5 3.37 Health / Long-term Care Lifecycle Indicate the expected lifecycle, in years, of the Solution(s) in use in Health / Long-term Care facilities [Select] Less than 2 years 2 - 4 years 4 - 8 years 8 - 12 years 12 - 20 years More than 20 years Selection Criteria Links 3.38 Capital Cost for Health / Long-term Care Facilities Select the approximate one-time capital cost that would be invested by a typical Health / Long-term Care Facility to acquire the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.39 Recurring cost for Health / Long-term Care Facilities Select the approximate recurring annual costs that would be paid by a typical Health / Long-term Care Facility to operate the Solution(s) [Select] less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.40 Recurring savings for Health / Long-term Care Facilities Select the approximate recurring annual cost savings that would be experienced by a typical Health / Long-term Care Facility that has acquired the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links Economic Benefits to End-users 3.41 Health / Long-term Care Facilities Most Significant Environmental Impact Using the pull-down menu below, specify the single area in which adoption of your Solution would have the largest incremental environmental impact [Select] Net electrical energy savings in buildings Net thermal energy savings in buildings Fuel consumption in vehicles Net energy use in manufacturing, agricultural, resource or other production Net energy use in infrastructure Water conservation Waste reduction or diversion Other (specify below) Selection Criteria Links Environmental Benefits 3.42 Health / Long-term Care Other Environmental Impact If you selected "Other" immediately above, provide a name or label for the impact measure (specify N/A if not applicablel). Selection Criteria Links 3.43 Health / Long-term Care Environmental Impact Unit of Measure Please specify, as relevant, the unit of measure that is relevant for the measuring the most significant environmental impact [Select] kwh cubic meters of natural gas equivalent litres tonnes Selection Criteria Links 3.44 Health / Long-term Care Environmental Impact Baseline In order to quantify a baseline for purposes of estimating the incremental environmental impact of your Solution(s) in a typical facility, by reference to the environmental impact and unit of measure selected above, provide an estimate of the average annual quantity of the units of measure specified above that would be consumed, generated, or otherwise occur in the absence of your Solution(s) Selection Criteria Links 3.45 Health / Long-term Care Environmental Impact Estimate How would the baseline quantity specified above be expected to change on an annual basis as a result of adopting the Solution(s) Not applicable / cannot estimate More than 50% annual net increase 30%-50% annual net increase 15%-30% annual net increase 10%-15% annual net increase 6%-10% annual net increase 3%-6% annual net increase Up to 3% annual net increase No change anticipated Up to 3% annual net reduction 3%-6% annual net reduction 6%-10% annual net reduction 10%-15% annual net reduction 15%-30% annual net reduction 30%-50% annual net reduction More than 50% annual net reduction Selection Criteria Links 3.46 Potential candidates for adoption among Health / Long-term Care Facilities within 5 years State the approximate number of Health / Long-term Care Facilities that could reasonably be expected to adopt the Solution(s) in Ontario within 5 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links 3.47 Long-term potential candidates for adoption among Health / Long-term Care Facilities State the approximate number of Health / Long-term Care Facilities that are potential Ontario candidates for adopting the Solution(s) within 10 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links Page 6 3.48 Education Lifecycle Indicate the expected lifecycle, in years, of the Solution(s) in use in Educational Facilities (primary, secondary schools) [Select] Less than 2 years 2 - 4 years 4 - 8 years 8 - 12 years 12 - 20 years More than 20 years Selection Criteria Links 3.49 Capital Cost for Education Facilities Select the approximate one-time capital cost that would be invested by a typical Educational Facilities to acquire the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.50 Recurring cost for Education Facilities Select the approximate recurring annual costs that would be paid by a typical Educational Facilities to operate the Solution(s) [Select] less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.51 Recurring savings for Education Facilities Select the approximate recurring annual cost savings that would be experienced by a typical Educational Facility that has acquired the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links Economic Benefits to End-users 3.52 Education Facilities Most Significant Environmental Impact Using the pull-down menu below, specify the single area in which adoption of your Solution would have the largest incremental environmental impact [Select] Net electrical energy savings in buildings Net thermal energy savings in buildings Fuel consumption in vehicles Net energy use in manufacturing, agricultural, resource or other production Net energy use in infrastructure Water conservation Waste reduction or diversion Other (specify below) Selection Criteria Links Environmental Benefits 3.53 Education Other Environmental Impact If you selected "Other" immediately above, provide a name or label for the impact measure (specify N/A if not applicablel). Selection Criteria Links 3.54 Education Environmental Impact Unit of Measure Please specify, as relevant, the unit of measure that is relevant for the measuring the most significant environmental impact [Select] kwh cubic meters of natural gas equivalent litres tonnes Selection Criteria Links 3.55 Education Environmental Impact Baseline In order to quantify a baseline for purposes of estimating the incremental environmental impact of your Solution(s) in a typical facility, by reference to the environmental impact and unit of measure selected above, provide an estimate of the average annual quantity of the units of measure specified above that would be consumed, generated, or otherwise occur in the absence of your Solution(s) Selection Criteria Links 3.56 Education Environmental Impact Estimate How would the baseline quantity specified above be expected to change on an annual basis as a result of adopting the Solution(s) Not applicable / cannot estimate More than 50% annual net increase 30%-50% annual net increase 15%-30% annual net increase 10%-15% annual net increase 6%-10% annual net increase 3%-6% annual net increase Up to 3% annual net increase No change anticipated Up to 3% annual net reduction 3%-6% annual net reduction 6%-10% annual net reduction 10%-15% annual net reduction 15%-30% annual net reduction 30%-50% annual net reduction More than 50% annual net reduction Selection Criteria Links 3.57 Potential candidates for adoption among Educational Facilities within 5 years State the approximate number of Educational Facilities that could reasonably be expected to adopt the Solution(s) in Ontario within 5 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links 3.58 Long-term potential candidates for adoption among Educational Facilities State the approximate number of Educational Facilities that are potential Ontario candidates for adopting the Solution(s) within 10 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links Page 7 3.59 Universities and Colleges Lifecycle Indicate the expected lifecycle, in years, of the Solution(s) in use in University / College facilities [Select] Less than 2 years 2 - 4 years 4 - 8 years 8 - 12 years 12 - 20 years More than 20 years Selection Criteria Links 3.60 Capital Cost for University and College Facilities Select the approximate one-time capital cost that would be invested by a typical University / College to acquire the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.61 Recurring cost for University and College Facilities Select the approximate recurring annual costs that would be paid by a typical University / College Facility to operate the Solution(s) [Select] less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.62 Recurring savings for University and College Facilities Select the approximate recurring annual cost savings that would be experienced by a typical University / College Facility that has acquired the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.63 University and College Facilities Most Significant Environmental Impact Using the pull-down menu below, specify the single area in which adoption of your Solution would have the largest incremental environmental impact [Select] Net electrical energy savings in buildings Net thermal energy savings in buildings Fuel consumption in vehicles Net energy use in manufacturing, agricultural, resource or other production Net energy use in infrastructure Water conservation Waste reduction or diversion Other (specify below) Selection Criteria Links Environmental Benefits Economic Benefits to End-users 3.64 University and College Facilities Other Environmental Impact If you selected "Other" immediately above, provide a name or label for the impact measure (specify N/A if not applicablel). Selection Criteria Links 3.65 University and College Facilities Environmental Impact Unit of Measure Please specify, as relevant, the unit of measure that is relevant for the measuring the most significant environmental impact [Select] kwh cubic meters of natural gas equivalent litres tonnes Selection Criteria Links 3.66 University and College Facilities Environmental Impact Baseline In order to quantify a baseline for purposes of estimating the incremental environmental impact of your Solution(s) in a typical facility, by reference to the environmental impact and unit of measure selected above, provide an estimate of the average annual quantity of the units of measure specified above that would be consumed, generated, or otherwise occur in the absence of your Solution(s) Selection Criteria Links 3.67 University and College Facilities Environmental Impact Estimate How would the baseline quantity specified above be expected to change on an annual basis as a result of adopting the Solution(s) Not applicable / cannot estimate More than 50% annual net increase 30%-50% annual net increase 15%-30% annual net increase 10%-15% annual net increase 6%-10% annual net increase 3%-6% annual net increase Up to 3% annual net increase No change anticipated Up to 3% annual net reduction 3%-6% annual net reduction 6%-10% annual net reduction 10%-15% annual net reduction 15%-30% annual net reduction 30%-50% annual net reduction More than 50% annual net reduction Selection Criteria Links 3.68 Potential candidates for adoption among University and College Facilities within 5 years State the approximate number of University / College Facilities that could reasonably be expected to adopt the Solution(s) in Ontario within 5 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links 3.69 Long-term potential candidates for adoption among University and College Facilities State the approximate number of University / College Facilities that are potential Ontario candidates for adopting the Solution(s) within 10 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links Page 8 3.70 Public Housing Lifecycle Indicate the expected lifecycle, in years, of the Solution(s) in use in Public Housing facilities [Select] Less than 2 years 2 - 4 years 4 - 8 years 8 - 12 years 12 - 20 years More than 20 years Selection Criteria Links 3.71 Capital Cost for Public Housing Facilities Select the approximate one-time capital cost that would be invested by a typical Public Housing Facility to acquire the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.72 Recurring cost for Public Housing Facilities Select the approximate recurring annual costs that would be paid by a typical Public Housing Facility to operate the Solution(s) [Select] less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.73 Recurring savings for Public Housing Facilities Select the approximate recurring annual cost savings that would be experienced by a typical Public Housing Facility that has acquired the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links Economic Benefits to End-users 3.74 Public Housing Facilities Most Significant Environmental Impact Using the pull-down menu below, specify the single area in which adoption of your Solution would have the largest incremental environmental impact [Select] Net electrical energy savings in buildings Net thermal energy savings in buildings Fuel consumption in vehicles Net energy use in manufacturing, agricultural, resource or other production Net energy use in infrastructure Water conservation Waste reduction or diversion Other (specify below) Selection Criteria Links Environmental Benefits 3.75 Public Housing Other Environmental Impact If you selected "Other" immediately above, provide a name or label for the impact measure (specify N/A if not applicablel). Selection Criteria Links 3.76 Public Housing Environmental Impact Unit of Measure Please specify, as relevant, the unit of measure that is relevant for the measuring the most significant environmental impact [Select] kwh cubic meters of natural gas equivalent litres tonnes Selection Criteria Links 3.77 Public Housing Environmental Impact Baseline In order to quantify a baseline for purposes of estimating the incremental environmental impact of your Solution(s) in a typical facility, by reference to the environmental impact and unit of measure selected above, provide an estimate of the average annual quantity of the units of measure specified above that would be consumed, generated, or otherwise occur in the absence of your Solution(s) Selection Criteria Links 3.78 Public Housing Environmental Impact Estimate How would the baseline quantity specified above be expected to change on an annual basis as a result of adopting the Solution(s) Not applicable / cannot estimate More than 50% annual net increase 30%-50% annual net increase 15%-30% annual net increase 10%-15% annual net increase 6%-10% annual net increase 3%-6% annual net increase Up to 3% annual net increase No change anticipated Up to 3% annual net reduction 3%-6% annual net reduction 6%-10% annual net reduction 10%-15% annual net reduction 15%-30% annual net reduction 30%-50% annual net reduction More than 50% annual net reduction Selection Criteria Links 3.79 Potential candidates for adoption among Public Housing Facilities within 5 years State the approximate number of Public Housing Facilities that could reasonably be expected to adopt the Solution(s) in Ontario within 5 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links 3.80 Long-term potential candidates for adoption among Public Housing Facilities State the approximate number of Public Housing Facilities that are potential Ontario candidates for adopting the Solution(s) within 10 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links Page 9 3.81 Corrections Lifecycle Indicate the expected lifecycle, in years, of the Solution(s) in use in Corrections facilities [Select] Less than 2 years 2 - 4 years 4 - 8 years 8 - 12 years 12 - 20 years More than 20 years Selection Criteria Links 3.82 Capital Cost for Corrections Facilities Select the approximate one-time capital cost that would be invested by a typical Corrections Facility to acquire the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.83 Recurring cost for Corrections Facilities Select the approximate recurring annual costs that would be paid by a typical Corrections Facility to operate the Solution(s) [Select] less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.84 Recurring savings for Corrections Facilities Select the approximate recurring annual cost savings that would be experienced by a typical Corrections Facility that has acquired the Solution(s) [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links Economic Benefits to End-users 3.85 Corrections Facilities Most Significant Environmental Impact Using the pull-down menu below, specify the single area in which adoption of your Solution would have the largest incremental environmental impact [Select] Net electrical energy savings in buildings Net thermal energy savings in buildings Fuel consumption in vehicles Net energy use in manufacturing, agricultural, resource or other production Net energy use in infrastructure Water conservation Waste reduction or diversion Other (specify below) Selection Criteria Links Environmental Benefits 3.86 Corrections Other Environmental Impact If you selected "Other" immediately above, provide a name or label for the impact measure (specify N/A if not applicablel). Selection Criteria Links 3.87 Corrections Environmental Impact Unit of Measure Please specify, as relevant, the unit of measure that is relevant for the measuring the most significant environmental impact [Select] kwh cubic meters of natural gas equivalent litres tonnes Selection Criteria Links 3.88 Corrections Environmental Impact Baseline In order to quantify a baseline for purposes of estimating the incremental environmental impact of your Solution(s) in a typical facility, by reference to the environmental impact and unit of measure selected above, provide an estimate of the average annual quantity of the units of measure specified above that would be consumed, generated, or otherwise occur in the absence of your Solution(s) Selection Criteria Links 3.89 Corrections Environmental Impact Estimate How would the baseline quantity specified above be expected to change on an annual basis as a result of adopting the Solution(s) Not applicable / cannot estimate More than 50% annual net increase 30%-50% annual net increase 15%-30% annual net increase 10%-15% annual net increase 6%-10% annual net increase 3%-6% annual net increase Up to 3% annual net increase No change anticipated Up to 3% annual net reduction 3%-6% annual net reduction 6%-10% annual net reduction 10%-15% annual net reduction 15%-30% annual net reduction 30%-50% annual net reduction More than 50% annual net reduction Selection Criteria Links 3.90 Potential candidates for adoption among Corrections Facilities within 5 years State the approximate number of Corrections Facilities that could reasonably be expected to adopt the Solution(s) in Ontario within 5 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links 3.91 Long-term potential candidates for adoption among Corrections Facilities State the approximate number of Corrections Facilities that are potential Ontario candidates for adopting the Solution(s) within 10 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links Page 10 3.92 Vehicle Fleets Lifecycle Indicate the expected lifecycle, in years, of the Solution(s) in use in a typical vehicle [Select] Less than 2 years 2 - 4 years 4 - 8 years 8 - 12 years 12 - 20 years More than 20 years Selection Criteria Links 3.93 Capital Cost for OPS/MASH Vehicle Fleets Select the approximate one-time capital cost that would be invested by a typical Vehicle Fleets to acquire the Solution(s) for a single vehicle [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.94 Recurring cost for Vehicle Fleets Select the approximate recurring annual costs that would be paid by a typical Fleet operator to operate the Solution(s) for a single vehicle [Select] less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.95 Recurring savings for Vehicle Fleets Select the approximate recurring annual cost savings that would be experienced by a typical Fleet operator that has acquired the Solution(s) for a single vehicle [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links Economic Benefits to End-users 3.96 Vehicle Fleets Most Significant Environmental Impact Using the pull-down menu below, specify the single area in which adoption of your Solution would have the largest incremental environmental impact [Select] Net electrical energy savings in buildings Net thermal energy savings in buildings Fuel consumption in vehicles Net energy use in manufacturing, agricultural, resource or other production Net energy use in infrastructure Water conservation Waste reduction or diversion Other (specify below) Selection Criteria Links Environmental Benefits 3.97 Vehicle Fleets Impact If you selected "Other" immediately above, provide a name or label for the impact measure (specify N/A if not applicablel). Selection Criteria Links 3.98 Vehicle Fleets Environmental Impact Unit of Measure Please specify, as relevant, the unit of measure that is relevant for the measuring the most significant environmental impact [Select] kwh cubic meters of natural gas equivalent litres tonnes Selection Criteria Links 3.99 Vehicle Fleets Environmental Impact Baseline In order to quantify a baseline for purposes of estimating the incremental environmental impact of your Solution(s) in a typical vehicle, by reference to the environmental impact and unit of measure selected above, provide an estimate of the average annual quantity of the units of measure specified above that would be consumed, generated, or otherwise occur in the absence of your Solution(s) Selection Criteria Links 3.100 Vehicle Fleets Environmental Impact Estimate How would the baseline quantity specified above be expected to change on an annual basis as a result of adopting the Solution(s) for a typical vehicle Not applicable / cannot estimate More than 50% annual net increase 30%-50% annual net increase 15%-30% annual net increase 10%-15% annual net increase 6%-10% annual net increase 3%-6% annual net increase Up to 3% annual net increase No change anticipated Up to 3% annual net reduction 3%-6% annual net reduction 6%-10% annual net reduction 10%-15% annual net reduction 15%-30% annual net reduction 30%-50% annual net reduction More than 50% annual net reduction Selection Criteria Links 3.101 Potential candidates for adoption among OPS/MASH Vehicle Fleets within 5 years State the approximate number of vehicles that could reasonably be expected to adopt the Solution(s) in Ontario within 5 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links 3.102 Long-term potential candidates for adoption among OPS/MASH Vehcile Fleets State the approximate number of vehicles that are potential Ontario candidates for adopting the Solution(s) within 10 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links Page 11 3.103 Electricity System Infrastructure Lifecycle Indicate the expected lifecycle, in years, of the Solution(s) in use in Electricity System Infrastructure [Select] Less than 2 years 2 - 4 years 4 - 8 years 8 - 12 years 12 - 20 years More than 20 years Selection Criteria Links 3.104 Capital Cost for Electricity System Infrastructure Select the approximate one-time capital cost that would be invested by a typical operator to acquire the Solution(s) for use in the Electricity System Infrastructure [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.105 Recurring cost for Electricity System Infrastructure Select the approximate recurring annual costs that would be paid by a typical operator to operate the Solution(s) in the Electricity System Infrastructure [Select] less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.106 Recurring savings for Electricity System Infrastructure Select the approximate recurring annual cost savings that would be experienced by a typical operator that has acquired the Solution(s) for use in the Electricity System Infrastructure [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links Economic Benefits to End-users 3.107 Electricity System Infrastructure Most Significant Environmental Impact Using the pull-down menu below, specify the single area in which adoption of your Solution would have the largest incremental environmental impact [Select] Net electrical energy savings in buildings Net thermal energy savings in buildings Fuel consumption in vehicles Net energy use in manufacturing, agricultural, resource or other production Net energy use in infrastructure Water conservation Waste reduction or diversion Other (specify below) Selection Criteria Links Environmental Benefits 3.108 Electricity System Infrastructure Other Impact If you selected "Other" immediately above, provide a name or label for the impact measure (specify N/A if not applicablel). Selection Criteria Links 3.109 Electricity System Infrastructure Environmental Impact Unit of Measure Please specify, as relevant, the unit of measure that is relevant for the measuring the most significant environmental impact [Select] kwh cubic meters of natural gas equivalent litres tonnes Selection Criteria Links 3.110 Electricity System Infrastructure Environmental Impact Baseline In order to quantify a baseline for purposes of estimating the incremental environmental impact of your Solution(s) in a typical vehicle, by reference to the environmental impact and unit of measure selected above, provide an estimate of the average annual quantity of the units of measure specified above that would be consumed, generated, or otherwise occur in the absence of your Solution(s) Selection Criteria Links 3.111 Electricity System Infrastructure Environmental Impact Estimate How would the baseline quantity specified above be expected to change on an annual basis as a result of adopting the Solution(s) Not applicable / cannot estimate More than 50% annual net increase 30%-50% annual net increase 15%-30% annual net increase 10%-15% annual net increase 6%-10% annual net increase 3%-6% annual net increase Up to 3% annual net increase No change anticipated Up to 3% annual net reduction 3%-6% annual net reduction 6%-10% annual net reduction 10%-15% annual net reduction 15%-30% annual net reduction 30%-50% annual net reduction More than 50% annual net reduction Selection Criteria Links 3.112 Potential candidates for adoption in the Electricity System Infrastructure within 5 years State the approximate number of facilities that could reasonably be expected to adopt the Solution(s) in Ontario within 5 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links 3.113 Long-term potential candidates for adoption within the Electricity System Infrastructure State the approximate number of facilities that are potential Ontario candidates for adopting the Solution(s) within 10 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links Page 12 3.114 Municipal Infrastructure Lifecycle Indicate the expected lifecycle, in years, of the Solution(s) in use in Municipal Infrastructure [Select] Less than 2 years 2 - 4 years 4 - 8 years 8 - 12 years 12 - 20 years More than 20 years Selection Criteria Links 3.115 Capital Cost for Municipal Infrastructure Select the approximate one-time capital cost that would be invested to acquire the Solution(s) for use in Municipal Infrastructure [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.116 Recurring cost for Municipal Infrastructure Select the approximate recurring annual costs that would be paid to operate the Solution(s) in the Municipal Infrastructure [Select] less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.117 Recurring savings for Municipal Infrastructure Select the approximate recurring annual cost savings that would be experienced by an entity that has acquired the Solution(s) for use in the Municipal Infrastructure [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links Economic Benefits to End-users 3.118 Municipal Infrastructure Most Significant Environmental Impact Using the pull-down menu below, specify the single area in which adoption of your Solution would have the largest incremental environmental impact [Select] Net electrical energy savings in buildings Net thermal energy savings in buildings Fuel consumption in vehicles Net energy use in manufacturing, agricultural, resource or other production Net energy use in infrastructure Water conservation Waste reduction or diversion Other (specify below) Selection Criteria Links Environmental Benefits 3.119 Municipal Infrastructure Other Impact If you selected "Other" immediately above, provide a name or label for the impact measure (specify N/A if not applicablel). Selection Criteria Links 3.120 Municipal Infrastructure Environmental Impact Unit of Measure Please specify, as relevant, the unit of measure that is relevant for the measuring the most significant environmental impact [Select] kwh cubic meters of natural gas equivalent litres tonnes Selection Criteria Links 3.121 Municipal Infrastructure Environmental Impact Baseline In order to quantify a baseline for purposes of estimating the incremental environmental impact of your Solution(s) in a typical municipality, by reference to the environmental impact and unit of measure selected above, provide an estimate of the average annual quantity of the units of measure specified above that would be consumed, generated, or otherwise occur in the absence of your Solution(s) Selection Criteria Links 3.122 Municipal Infrastructure Environmental Impact Estimate How would the baseline quantity specified above be expected to change on an annual basis as a result of adopting the Solution(s) Not applicable / cannot estimate More than 50% annual net increase 30%-50% annual net increase 15%-30% annual net increase 10%-15% annual net increase 6%-10% annual net increase 3%-6% annual net increase Up to 3% annual net increase No change anticipated Up to 3% annual net reduction 3%-6% annual net reduction 6%-10% annual net reduction 10%-15% annual net reduction 15%-30% annual net reduction 30%-50% annual net reduction More than 50% annual net reduction Selection Criteria Links 3.123 Potential candidates for adoption in Municipal Infrastructure within 5 years State the approximate number of facilities that could reasonably be expected to adopt the Solution(s) in Ontario within 5 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links 3.124 Long-term potential candidates for adoption within Municipal Infrastructure State the approximate number of facilities that are potential Ontario candidates for adopting the Solution(s) within 10 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links Page 13 3.125 Provincial Infrastructure Lifecycle Indicate the expected lifecycle, in years, of the Solution(s) in use in Provincial Infrastructure [Select] Less than 2 years 2 - 4 years 4 - 8 years 8 - 12 years 12 - 20 years More than 20 years Selection Criteria Links 3.126 Capital Cost for Provincial Infrastructure Select the approximate one-time capital cost that would be invested to acquire the Solution(s) for use in Provincial Infrastructure [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.127 Recurring cost for Provincial Infrastructure Select the approximate recurring annual costs that would be paid to operate the Solution(s) in the Provincial Infrastructure [Select] less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links 3.128 Recurring savings for Provincial Infrastructure Select the approximate recurring annual cost savings that would be experienced by an entity that has acquired the Solution(s) for use in Provincial Infrastructure [Select] $0 less than $100 $100 - $250 $250 - $500 $500 - $1,000 $1,000 - $5,000 $5,000 - $10,000 more than $10,000 Selection Criteria Links Economic Benefits to End-users 3.129 Provincial Infrastructure Most Significant Environmental Impact Using the pull-down menu below, specify the single area in which adoption of your Solution would have the largest incremental environmental impact [Select] Net electrical energy savings in buildings Net thermal energy savings in buildings Fuel consumption in vehicles Net energy use in manufacturing, agricultural, resource or other production Net energy use in infrastructure Water conservation Waste reduction or diversion Other (specify below) Selection Criteria Links Environmental Benefits 3.130 Provincial Infrastructure Other Impact If you selected "Other" immediately above, provide a name or label for the impact measure (specify N/A if not applicablel). Selection Criteria Links 3.131 Provincial Infrastructure Environmental Impact Unit of Measure Please specify, as relevant, the unit of measure that is relevant for the measuring the most significant environmental impact [Select] kwh cubic meters of natural gas equivalent litres tonnes Selection Criteria Links 3.132 Provincial Infrastructure Environmental Impact Baseline In order to quantify a baseline for purposes of estimating the incremental environmental impact of your Solution(s) in a typical municipality, by reference to the environmental impact and unit of measure selected above, provide an estimate of the average annual quantity of the units of measure specified above that would be consumed, generated, or otherwise occur in the absence of your Solution(s) Selection Criteria Links 3.133 Provincial Infrastructure Environmental Impact Estimate How would the baseline quantity specified above be expected to change on an annual basis as a result of adopting the Solution(s) Not applicable / cannot estimate More than 50% annual net increase 30%-50% annual net increase 15%-30% annual net increase 10%-15% annual net increase 6%-10% annual net increase 3%-6% annual net increase Up to 3% annual net increase No change anticipated Up to 3% annual net reduction 3%-6% annual net reduction 6%-10% annual net reduction 10%-15% annual net reduction 15%-30% annual net reduction 30%-50% annual net reduction More than 50% annual net reduction Selection Criteria Links 3.134 Potential candidates for adoption in Provincial Infrastructure within 5 years State the approximate number of facilities that could reasonably be expected to adopt the Solution(s) in Ontario within 5 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links 3.135 Long-term potential candidates for adoption within the Provincial Infrastructure State the approximate number of facilities that are potential Ontario candidates for adopting the Solution(s) within 10 years of successful completion of the proposed Pilot Project Selection Criteria Links Page 14 3.136 Estimated Lifecycle Changes in Environmental Impacts With reference to the most significant positive environmental impact as indicated above, indicate how that impact would likely change over the life cycle of the technology/product: Annual impact will decline significantly over the lifecycle of the Solution(s) (more than 5% annual decline) Annual impact will decline somewhat over the lifecycle of the Solution(s) (less than 5% annual decline) Annual impact will be stable over the lifecycle of the Solution(s) Annual impact will increase somewhat over the lifecycle of the Solution(s) (less than 5% annual increase) Annual impact will increase somewhat over the lifecycle of the Solution(s) (greater than 5% annual increase) Selection Criteria Links 3.137 Estimated Lifecycle Changes in Operating Cost Impacts With reference to the operating cost savings specified above, indicate how that impact would likely change over the life cycle of the technology/product: Annual impact will decline significantly over the lifecycle of the Solution(s) (more than 5% annual decline) Annual impact will decline somewhat over the lifecycle of the Solution(s) (less than 5% annual decline) Annual impact will be stable over the lifecycle of the Solution(s) Annual impact will increase somewhat over the lifecycle of the Solution(s) (less than 5% annual increase) Annual impact will increase somewhat over the lifecycle of the Solution(s) (greater than 5% annual increase) Selection Criteria Links 3.138 Potential Pilot Project Scope Please indicate the ideal scope of the proposed pilot project i.e. the number of installations you would consider necessary to effectively demonstrate the strength and flexibility of the technology. In this context, "installation" as the same meaning as noted above: 1 installation 2 installations 3 installations 4 installations 5 installations 5-10 installations more than 10 installations Selection Criteria Links Need for a demonstration project 3.139 Estimated cost of Potential Pilot Project Please provide below an estimate of the total cost for a potential pilot project, including all costs: technology customization and manufacture, installation, maintenance, performance monitoring, etc. over 2 years: less than $10K $10K-$25K $25K-$50K $50K-$100K $100K-$500K $500K-$1M $1M-$2M more than $2M Selection Criteria Links Need for a demonstration project Page 15 3.140 Potential Market Applicability From the following list, select the market application(s) in which your Solution(s) could have a significant environmental impact and/or could significantly reduce operating costs for relevant users. Click "applicable" for as many as are applicable. Buildings: Residential housing - single family Applicable Not applicable Buildings: Residential housing - multi family/high-rise Applicable Not applicable Buildings: Office/commercial Applicable Not applicable Buildings: Institutional - health/education/etc Applicable Not applicable Buildings: Industrial buildings Applicable Not applicable Vehicles: Cars Applicable Not applicable Vehicles: trucks Applicable Not applicable Vehicles: transit Applicable Not applicable Vehicles: equipment Applicable Not applicable Vehicles: other Applicable Not applicable Industrial manufacturing Applicable Not applicable Resource processing - mining/forestry Applicable Not applicable Food production and processing Applicable Not applicable Other (specify) Applicable Not applicable Selection Criteria Links 3.141 Market Applications Other: Specify Specify additional details if appropriate relating to above question, or enter "N/A" if not applicable: Selection Criteria Links 3.142 Estimate of the Ontario Current Market Size Indicate your estimate of the current size of the Ontario market for your Solution(s): less than $100K $100K-$1M $1M-$10M $10M-$100M $100M-$1B more than $1B Selection Criteria Links 3.143 Estimate of the Canada Current Market Size Indicate your estimate of the current size of the Canadian market for your Solution(s) less than $100K $100K-$1M $1M-$10M $10M-$100M $100M-$1B more than $1B Selection Criteria Links 3.144 Estimate of the North American Current Market Size Indicate your estimate of the current size of the North American market for your Solution(s) less than $100K $100K-$1M $1M-$10M $10M-$100M $100M-$1B more than $1B Selection Criteria Links 3.145 Estimate of the International Current Market Size Indicate your estimate of the current size of the international market for your Solution(s) less than $100K $100K-$1M $1M-$10M $10M-$100M $100M-$1B more than $1B Selection Criteria Links Page 16 3.146 Scale up after successful pilot: Revenue Growth Indicate your estimate of the number of years required for your organization to achieve more than $10M in annual revenues from the Solution(s) 1 to 2 years 2 to 4 years 4 to 6 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years Selection Criteria Links 3.147 Scale up after successful pilot: Share of Ontario Market Indicate your estimate of the number of years required for your organization to achieve more than 10% of the Ontario Market Size specified above: 1 to 2 years 2 to 4 years 4 to 6 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years Selection Criteria Links 3.148 Scale up after successful pilot: Share of Canadian Market Indicate your estimate of the number of years required for your organization to achieve more than 5% of the Canadian Market Size specified above: 1 to 2 years 2 to 4 years 4 to 6 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years Selection Criteria Links 3.149 Scale up after successful pilot: Share of North American Market Indicate your estimate of the number of years required for your organization to achieve more than 3% of the North American Market Size specified above: 1 to 2 years 2 to 4 years 4 to 6 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years Selection Criteria Links 3.150 Scale up after successful pilot: Share of International Market Indicate your estimate of the number of years required for your organization to achieve more than 2% of the International Market Size specified above: 1 to 2 years 2 to 4 years 4 to 6 years 6 to 10 years More than 10 years Selection Criteria Links Page 17

Open EOI / DOI Part 4: Self-assessment Relative to Review Criteria Open EOI Part 4 A1.1 Environmental Benefits GreenFIT pilot projects should reduce the environmental footprint of OPS/MASH facilities through at least one of the following: Greenhouse Gas and toxic emission reductions; Waste Diversion; Resource Conservation (e.g. water); Energy Conservation; Renewable Energy Generation. Based on the information provided in this EOI Template, select the statement below that best describes the environmental benefits of the Solution(s)/service that could be demonstrated in a potential pilot project. Please justify your selection, in 250 words or less, using the textbox below. Please provide detail on specific benefits directly related to the reduction of environmental footprint of OPS/MASH facilities and the sustainability of these benefits: Options: A: The Solution(s) has(have) the potential to demonstrate modest short term environmental benefits in one of the areas listed above B: The Solution(s) has(have) the potential to would demonstrate measurable longer term benefits in one of the above areas or modest short term benefits in more than one of the above areas C: The Solution(s) has(have) the potential to demonstrate significant and enduring lifecycle benefits in one of the above areas D: The Solution(s) has(have) the potential to demonstrate significant and enduring lifecycle benefits in more than one of the above areas Your score and comments: Correlation and Upload Links Part 1: Primary Product / Technology Focus (data) Part 1: Potential Pilot Project Focus (data) Part 1: Potential Pilot Project Focus: Specify (if "Other" selected) (data) Part 2: Product / Technology Summary (data) Part 2: Applications with significant positive environmental impacts (data) Part 2: Application with the most significant positive environmental impact (data) Part 2: Typical Installation (data) Part 3: Potential OPS / MASH Applicability (data) Part 3: Health / Long-term Care Facilities Most Significant Environmental Impact (data) Part 3: Education Facilities Most Significant Environmental Impact (data) Part 3: University and College Facilities Most Significant Environmental Impact (data) Part 3: Public Housing Facilities Most Significant Environmental Impact (data) Part 3: Corrections Facilities Most Significant Environmental Impact (data) Part 3: OPS/MASH Office Facilities Most Significant Environmental Impact (data) Part 3: OPS/MASH Vehicle Fleets Most Significant Environmental Impact (data) Part 3: Electricity System Infrastructure Most Significant Environmental Impact (data) Part 3: Municipal Infrastructure Most Significant Environmental Impact (data) Part 3: Provincial Infrastructure Most Significant Environmental Impact (data) Part 3: Environmental and operating cost value streams (chart) A1.2 Solution(s) Readiness From the list below, please select which of the statements best describes the readiness of the Solution(s) for pilot project deployment. Please justify your selection, in 250 words or less, using the textbox below, providing specific references or descriptions regarding previous, current or planned use(s): Options: A: The Solution(s) has(have) not yet reached full commercial status B: The Solution(s) has(have) had limited commercial success in other applications but has not yet been adapted for use in the applications that would be proposed for a pilot project C: The Solution(s) has(have) had a first application in a use highly similar to the application proposed for a pilot project but has not yet been proven in full scale commercial conditions in this application area D: The Solution(s) proposed for the project has(have) been commercially proven in other application areas and will require only modest adaptations for the uses planned in the pilot project. Your score and comments: Correlation and Upload Links Part 2: Product / Technology Summary (data) Part 2: Market status (data) Part 2: Impact validation (data) A1.3 Solution(s) Competitive Differentiation From the options below, please select the statement that best describes the positioning of the Solution(s) relative to competitors. Please justify your selection, in 250 words or less, using the textbox below. You should supplement your response with specific references or descriptions. Options: A: The Solution(s) proposed for the Project is(are) substantially similar to other products available in the marketplace B: The Solution(s) has(have) a number of advantages over substantially similar products available in the marketplace C: The Solution(s) has(have) a number of proprietary unique features that most existing customers perceive as superior to competitive products D: The Solution(s) represent(s) breakthrough technology and will enable the company to maintain a competitive advantage in existing and new markets Your score and comments: Correlation and Upload Links Part 2: Product / Technology Summary (data) Part 2: Intellectual Property (Patent) Status and Ownership (data) A1.4 Market Opportunity From the list below, please select which of the statements best describes the market opportunity for the Solution(s) and why the proposed pilot project would assist in capturing these opportunities. Please justify your selection, in 250 words or less, using the textbox below. You should supplement your response with specific references or descriptions. Options: A: The markets for the Solution(s) proposed are small, have little growth and/or are highly competitive B: The markets for the Solution(s) proposed offer some interesting niche market opportunities with reasonable growth potential, primarily in North America C: The markets for the Solution(s) proposed are global and have significant growth potential. A successful Ontario project is likely to open access to at least some niche markets world-wide D: The markets for the Solution(s) proposed are global and have significant and sustained growth potential. A successful Ontario project is highly likely to open access to global markets which go beyond the pilot project application Your score and comments: Correlation and Upload Links Part 2: Product Positioning of Market Rollout (data) Part 2: Resource Requirements for Market Roll-out (data) Part 2: Market Roll-out Risk (data) Part 3: Market size and share estimates (chart) A1.5 Economic Benefits to End-users GreenFIT pilot projects should seek to create meaningful and enduring benefits which could include such benefits as reductions in life cycle costs, reduced operating costs, extended operational life for existing capital assets, and other relevant economic benefits. From the options below, please select the statement that best describes the estimated benefits to end users arising from the Project based on the proposed Solution(s). Please justify your selection, in 250 words or less, using the textbox below: Options: A: Adoption of the Solution(s) would likely create net negative economic costs for the end user B: Adoption of the Solution(s) would be breakeven or create a small net economic benefit for the end user C: Adoption of the Solution(s) would create significant short term economic benefits for the end user D: Adoption of the Solution(s) would create significant short and long term economic benefits for the end user Your score and comments: Correlation and Upload Links Part 3: Potential OPS / MASH Applicability (data) Part 3: Recurring savings for Health / Long-term Care Facilities (data) Part 3: Recurring savings for Education Facilities (data) Part 3: Recurring savings for University and College Facilities (data) Part 3: Recurring savings for Public Housing Facilities (data) Part 3: Recurring savings for Corrections Facilities (data) Part 3: Recurring savings for OPS/MASH Office Facilities (data) Part 3: Recurring savings for OPS/MASH Vehicle Fleets (data) Part 3: Recurring savings for Electricity System Infrastructure (data) Part 3: Recurring savings for Municipal Infrastructure (data) Part 3: Recurring savings for Provincial Infrastructure (data) Part 3: Environmental and operating cost value streams (chart) A1.6 OPS / MASH Rollout Potential GreenFIT pilot projects should have the potential, after a successful pilot, to potentially be adopted in multiple locations within one or more Ontario societal systems (education, health, energy, etc.) to generate significant environmental and/or cost-saving benefits for operating entities and society. From the options below, please select the statement that best describes the anticipated rollout potential of your Solution(s). Please justify your selection, in 250 words or less, using the textbox below: Options: A: Roll-out potential exists for up to 20% of operating entities within a single OPS/MASH sector or system B: Roll-out potential exists for up to 20% of operating entities within multiple OPS/MASH sectors or systems C: Roll-out potential exists for more than 20% of operating entities within a single OPS/MASH sector or system D: Roll-out potential exists for more than 20% of operating entities within multiple OPS/MASH sectors or systems Your score and comments: Correlation and Upload Links A1.7 Economic Benefits to Ontario GreenFIT potential pilot projects should have the potential to create meaningful and enduring benefits in Ontario, which could include, but are not limited to: jobs, spin offs, creation of new capacity, etc.From the options below, please select the statement that best describes the estimated benefits arising from the pilot project based on the proposed Solution(s). Please justify your selection, in 250 words or less, using the textbox below. Please be as specific as you can about the benefits, their magnitude and their duration. Options: A: The Solution(s) is(are) unlikely to produce economic benefits beyond those that arise directly from Ontario end-users who adopt the Solution(s) B: The Solution(s) is(are) likely to produce some economic benefits beyond those that arise directly from Ontario end-users who adopt the Solution(s) C: The Solution(s) is(are) likely to produce significant economic benefits beyond those that arise directly from Ontario end-users who adopt the Solution(s) D: The Solution(s) is(are) likely to produce significant and long term economic benefits in areas of strategic importance to Ontario well beyond those that arise directly from Ontario end-users who adopt the Solution(s) Your score and comments: Correlation and Upload Links Part 3: Market size and share estimates (chart)